关于罪犯的惩罚措施的雅思英语作文

有些人认为每个类型的犯罪都应该有固定的惩罚，有的人认为要看犯罪的动机来惩罚。下面有小编整理的关于这个话题的雅思英语作文，大家可以参考参考。

　　Topic : Some people belive that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime . Others , however , argue that the circumstances of an individual crime , and the motivation for committing it , should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment uss both these views and give your own opinion .

Fixing punishments for each type of crime has been a debatable issue . There are many arguments supporting both views , those for and those against fixed punishments .

On the one hand , fixed punishments will have a deterring effect on society . Individuals knowing that they will be subject to a certain punishment if they are convicted with a given crime , will reconsider committing this act in the first place .

This deterring effect also leads to social stability and security , through minimising the number of crimes committed .

If people knew they would be able to convince the court or the jury of a reason for having committed the crime they are accused of , penal decisions would be largely arbitrary . This would result into criminals getting away with their crimes and into a high level of injustice caused by the subjective approach of different courts .

On the other hand , taking the circumstances of a crime and its motivation into consideration is a prerequisite for establishing and ensuring justice and equity .

A person killing in self-defense can not be compared to a serial killer , moving from one victim to the next . In my opinion an intermediary position between both solutions is the perfect way to establish and ensure justice and equity .

There has to be fixed punishment for all crimes . However , criminal laws have to provide for a minimum and maximum for the punishment and the laws also have to foresee certain cases of exemptions .

An example for setting minimum and maximum penalties is competition law where a person being held liable of a crime under this law will be convicted to pay a fine , according to the harm caused by the violation and the profit gained by the violator through committing the crime .

As for the exemptions , in some countries the law exempts thiefs stealing food during a a period of famine taking into consideration the distress and hunger .

Also , a person killing in self-defense will be exempted from punishment.

　　参考翻译：对每种类型的固定惩罚犯罪一直是一个有争议的问题。支持这两种观点都有很多参数,和那些反对固定的惩罚。

一方面,固定的惩罚会对社会有威慑作用。个人知道他们将受到一定的惩罚,如果他们与给定的犯罪定罪,将在第一时间考虑提交本条例。

这种威慑效应也会导致社会稳定和安全,通过最小化犯罪的数量。

如果人们知道他们能够说服法庭或陪审团的原因他们犯了罪被指控刑事决定将很大程度上是任意的。这将导致成罪犯盗走他们的罪行和高水平的不公平造成的主观方法不同的法院。

另一方面,犯罪及其动机的情况考虑是建立和确保公平和正义的先决条件。

一个人出于自卫杀死不能相比,一个连环杀手,从一个受害者。在我看来这两个解决方案之间的中间位置是最完美的`方式建立和确保公平和正义。

必须有固定的对所有罪行的惩罚。然而,刑法必须提供最小和最大的惩罚,法律也必须预见某些情况下的豁免。

一个例子设置最小和最大的惩罚是竞争法,一个人承担责任的犯罪在这个法律将会被罚款,根据违反造成的伤害和获得的利润由行为人的犯罪。

至于豁免,在一些国家法律免除小偷偷窃食物在饥荒时期考虑痛苦和饥饿。

同样,一个人杀死在自卫将免除处罚。